Question of the day: Are unsupported (sagging) big natural tits still “good” tits if they only look good when supported? And by support I mean, bikinis, push-up bras, clothing that just reveals cleavage, manual cupping and other gravity defying manipulations. I used (sweet) Yurizan as an example in those 4 comparison pics above. While I do like her as a big boobs model I’ve always been slightly turned off by her asymmetric slightly weird looking left breast. Moreover her natural unsupported cleavage (3rd pic from the left) seems to be more fitting for a 40+ model. Maybe it’s just my high standards (or my fake boob fetish) but I think there’s a huge difference in hotness depending on whether she’s posing in a bikini or totally nude and unsupported. Even in the red leather outfit (2nd pic) where she’s virtually nude that little bit of lift makes her look stunning compared to photo #1 and #3. The black bikini shot is great.
Yurizan Gallery 1 – Yurizan Gallery 2 – Yurizan Gallery 3
(I actually like her best as a busty blonde in gallery 1)
Instead of just abusing Yurizan as a guinea pig I’m also posting a couple of unsupported breast pics (no implants) of myself below. Fortunately I’m blessed with absolutely symmetrical tits, but they’re like any other natural rack not immune to gravitational pull. Even if I look at pics of myself I’d rather have my tits framed with (at least) bikini strings to the side and underneath the boobs, it’s probably not much additional lift but somewhat hotter looking. When I consider getting implants (mostly when I’m either drunk, depressed or someone insults my knockers – or all of the above) I usually don’t want to augment for size but projection, meaning that you get that invisible wonder-bra effect even if you’re completely nude. Anyway, I’m still pretty happy with my rack and cleavage and I didn’t mean to be hard on Yurizan, but she’s a good example. I’d love to hear what you have to say. Is projection (gravity defying tits) good even if it means getting implants or would you rather play with (or look at) a pair of natural tits that can still hold a pencil in place on the undersides of the breasts? (In case you’re wondering, that’s how I checked if my boobs were big enough as a teenage girl, doing the infamous pencil test…)
8 Responses to “Good or bad? Yurizan’s unsupported natural tits vs gravity”
Leave a Reply
Denis
11. Sep, 2006
There is nothing worse the drooping breasts in a porno. It is ugly: such beautiful person and such saggy breasts (http://www.bigboobsalert.com/sweet-yurizan-truck.php pic #9) . She probably never wore a bra…
Denis
12. Sep, 2006
Britney, please publish you cum-eating fotos in this blog. Please, Britney.
Me
12. Sep, 2006
Well, you know there are so many forms and tastes out there. With Yurizan I think the red thing is pretty hot for a mixed reasons. On the other hand, Labatidora (on the top right of your website) can sure hold a pencil and looks very nice. But it’s also a matter of pose, like in which direction gravity works, e.g. body bent forward, lying on back, even if the shoulders are pulled up or relaxed etc. etc.
Especially with large breasts I’d not get implants. It may give you a cool effect for a few years, but it’s just more mass for gravity to pull on and I’m sure you’ll pay for that later and a life can be very long these days.
But besides all that, all tits look best with cum on them
Markus
Britney
12. Sep, 2006
Markus: I like men who know how boobs work. Interesting comment, keep em coming and I’ll try to get some of my cum sprayed boob pics up on COB as a little thank you.
rob
23. Sep, 2006
HIGH BRITNEY!
please contact me as soon as you can so we can discuss your pictures being published in my book…;)
much love sweetie.
hope all is well.
420
Thermo
20. Jan, 2007
I’m discovering this just now. Funnily enough, Yurizan is, together with you, one of my favourite big boobs models. Hers are saggy, that’s true, but somehow they’re sexy and welcoming and they look beautiful with the rest of her bofy. I dunno but the combination between a winning smile like hers and big saggy boobs (but the nipples are dead lovely) is irresistible. Anyway, I’m entirely biased towards natural breasts so it’s no surprise I can “deal with” those that are subject to gravity. Actually, the more I look at boobs, and the more I look at women, the more I love what most people would call flaws. A few wrinkles here, some gravitational pull, yes even the odd bit of cellulite on an appetising big butt. Yummy!
Britney
21. Jan, 2007
Nice comment Thermo! Thanks for taking the time to analyze the issue a little more “in-depth”. You make some really interesting observations.
Bob
21. Jun, 2008
What? Are you all fucking crazy? I would suck that girls tits until my head collapsed. Uneven areolas? What the fuck is wrong with you? Once you past the tits, there is a pussy and ass made in heaven where I could lose myself for days at a time.